Home Contact Us Directions/Map Ellis Financial Group
Investor Access

Posts Tagged ‘2009’

Why this is not a “Lost Decade”

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

We have lost track in the last year of the number of times we have heard commentators on TV, radio or in print make a statement that if you were in the S&P 500 you lost money in the last 10 years (-0.95%), hence a “lost decade”.  Though the statement is true that the S&P 500 lost money, the danger is to assume that you as the investor did the same, worse or that you will loose the same for the next decade.

The past decade has been one of the most challenging on record for investors.   We experienced two recessions, which hasn’t happened since the 1930s.  The real question is “During this volatile period, how have well run equity mutual fund managers done?”

The below chart illustrates how a balanced portfolio brought back a 59.9% cumulative return in 10 years compared to 9.1% for the S&P 500.  While past returns are not predictive of future results, they powerfully illustrate how “good money managers” and a well diversified portfolio help investors achieve their long-term goals.   We continue to belief the key elements to successful investing include:  1) Diversifying in the appropriate mix of stocks and bonds based upon your risk tolerance  2) Optimizing your portfolio with an appropriate mix of different asset classes.  3) Hiring quality managers that have consistently beat their benchmarks  4) Regularly monitoring and rebalancing your portfolio when appropriate.

Source:  Russell, MSCI Inc., Dow Jones, Standard and Poor’s Barclays Capital, NCREIF, J.P. Morgan Asset Management.  The “balanced” portfolio assumes the following weights: 25% in the S&P 500, 10% in the Russell 2000, 15% in the MSCI EAFE, 5% in the MSCI EMI, 30% in the Barclays Capital Aggregate, 5% in the CS/Tremont Equity Market Neutral Index, 5% in the DJ UBS Commodity Index, and 5% in the NAREIT Equity REIT Index.  Balanced portfolio assumes annual rebalancing.  All data except commodities represent total return for stated period.  Past performance is not indicative of future returns.  Data are as of 12/31/09, except for the CS/Tremont Equity Market Neutral Index, which reflects data through 11/30/09.  “10 Year” returns represent cumulative total return and are not annualized.  Index Definition: S&P500 (500 large-cap common stocks actively traded in the United States), Russell 2000 (small cap index), MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Farr East index), Barclays Capital Aggregate (investment grade bonds index), CS/Tremont Equity Market Neutral (hedge fund index), DJ UBS Commodity Index (commodities index) , NAREIT Equity REIT Index (real estate investment trust index).  You cannot invest directly in any index.  Individual results will vary.

Source AD #C10-03249.  An excerpt from our 4th Quarter 2009 newsletter.  Written by Marvin T. Ellis, Jr, Financial Consultant.

A New 2009 Alzheimer's Report

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

On September 21, 2009, World Alzheimer’s Day, Alzheimer’s Disease International released a new report indicating that the number of people with Alzheimer’s or another dementia, currently 35 million worldwide, is expected to nearly double every 20 years, to 65.7 million in 2030 and 115.4 million in 2050.

According to the 2009 Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures report, issued by the Alzheimer’s Association, someone in the United States develops the disease every 70 seconds, and an estimated 5.1 million Americans over age 65 have the disease. This report also states that about 2.7 million people over age 85 have Alzheimer’s, and that by the time the first of the baby boomer generation reaches 85 in 2031, an estimated 3.5 million seniors in that age group will have disease.

These statistics highlight the need for estate planning in general and incapacity planning in particular, as well as disability, long-term care, and special needs planning.

Please give us a call to begin the process.

Quarterly Market Review: April-June, 2009

Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

Stock investors could scarcely have asked for a much better quarter. Investors skeptical about economic recovery in the back half of 2009 were left on the sidelines as the rally that began in early March continued to power upward. All the major indexes moved into positive territory for 2009–at least temporarily. From their March lows, the S&P 500 at one point had risen just short of 40%, the Dow was up 34.4%, the tech-heavy Nasdaq shot up 46.8%, and small caps climbed a head-turning 53.8%. Increased stock issuance, technical resistance levels, higher mortgage rates, automaker bankruptcies–through mid-June, little seemed to faze investors. However, profit-taking and “show me the money” sentiment took a toll in the quarter’s final weeks.

Bond investors generally demonstrated renewed appetite for risk, as high-yield outperformed other types of debt. More issuance of federal debt and grousing by overseas governments holding dollar-denominated investments helped send Treasury yields up and prices down, though by quarter’s end that trend had begun to reverse. The Fed’s effort to hold down interest rates by buying Treasuries helped provide some stability to bond markets. As 10-year Treasury yields flirted with 4% at one point, they began to raise questions about whether yields would continue to push mortgage rates higher, or might at some point represent an increased threat to equities.


Economic Data/Currencies

Data Current Year Over Year Notes
Consumer Price Index (CPI) (as of June 17) +0.1% -1.3% Largest annual decline in inflation rate since 1950
Unemployment rate (as of July 2 for June) 9.5% +4% Up from 7.2% at the end of 2008 and 5.5% a year ago
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (June 25 for Q1) -5.5% Better than Q4 2008′s -6.3%, and slightly better than previous estimate of -5.7%
As of June 30, 1 euro equaled: $1.40 Dollar weaker than March’s $1.32
As of June 30, $1 equaled: ¥95.55 Dollar weaker than March’s ¥97.29


The Markets

Market/Index June 30 Quarterly Change Year Over Year
DJIA 8447.00 +11.0% -25.6%
NASDAQ 1835.04 +20.0% -20.0%
S&P 500 919.32 +15.2% -28.2%
Russell 2000 508.28 +20.2% -26.3%
Global Dow 1629.31 +20.9% -34.0%
Fed. Funds .25% 0 -175 bps
2-year Treasuries 1.11% +30 bps -152 bps
10-year Treasuries 3.53% +82 bps -46 bps
Crude Oil (per barrel) $69.82 +44% -50.1%
Spot Gold (per oz.) $928.50 +.8% +.4%


Quarterly Economic Perspective

  • Investors (and even the Federal Reserve Board) at times seemed uncertain whether to worry more about inflation or deflation. One of the few positive side effects of the sinking economy seemed to be inflation measures that remained relatively benign–particularly compared with a year ago, when skyrocketing oil and food prices helped push the annual inflation rate to 4.2%. As a result, the Fed recently indicated that it doesn’t foresee raising interest rates for “an extended period.”
  • The unemployment rate rose a full percentage point over the quarter, bringing the number of jobs lost since the recession’s December 2007 start to 6.5 million. Including marginally attached and involuntary part-time workers, the unemployment rate reached 16.5% in June. Weekly unemployment figures at quarter’s end indicated that job losses could be slowing, though actual gains seemed likely to remain elusive.
  • Sales of existing homes began to turn up in the second quarter, though they were still down by 3.6% from May of last year. However, foreclosures and short sales were a major factor in pushing those numbers higher, as were median home prices that were 16.8% lower than last year. First-time homebuyers lured by a federal tax credit represented a substantial piece of the market. However, by the end of the quarter, problems with conservative home appraisals and rising mortgage rates loomed as potential threats to a housing recovery.
  • The difference between 2-year and 10-year Treasury interest rates increased from 1.9% to 2.42% by the end of the quarter. However, it was unclear whether that steeper yield curve represented a harbinger of economic recovery, as it has in the past, or investor concern about increased U.S. Treasury debt.
  • The International Monetary Fund forecast that global recovery would be slower than expected, and that the world economy would shrink by 1.3% this year rather than the 0.5% growth it forecast in January. Next year’s 1.9% growth rate forecast was two-thirds of the IMF’s January projection for 2010.
  • Americans continued to save more. By May, savings represented 6.9% of personal income–quite a change from the 0.0% of early 2008.


Investor’s Almanac

History Lessons: In the year following each of the last six recessions, small-cap stocks outperformed the S&P 500, by anywhere from 1.3% (1970-71) to 28.4% (1980-81).

Did You Know? A bull market is generally considered to occur when market indexes rise by at least 20%. A secular bull market is one in which the stock market generally rises over a period that may last anywhere from 5-25 years. A cyclical bull market is much shorter, and may occur during an overall secular bear market.

All information is based on sources deemed reliable, but no warranty or guarantee is made as to its accuracy or completeness. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any securities, and should not be relied on as financial advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) is a price-weighted index composed of 30 widely-traded blue-chip U.S. common stocks. The S&P 500 is a market-cap weighted index composed of the common stocks of 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy. The Nasdaq Composite Index is a market-value weighted index of all common stocks listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange. The Russell 2000 is a market-cap weighted index composed of 2000 U.S. small-cap common stocks. The Global Dow is an equally weighted index of 150 widely traded blue-chip common stocks worldwide. Market indexes listed are unmanaged and are not available for direct investment.

The Cash for Clunkers Bill

Monday, July 6th, 2009

The Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save (CARS) Act of 2009 – July 2, 2009

President signs the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save (CARS) Act of 2009

On June 19, 2009, as part of a military appropriations bill, Congress passed the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save (CARS) Act of 2009. President Obama signed the bill on June 24, 2009.

The CARS Act of 2009, also known as the Cash for Clunkers bill, provides consumers with an incentive (in the form of a $3,500 or $4,500 voucher) to trade in an old gas guzzler (foreign or domestic) against the purchase or lease price of a more fuel-efficient new vehicle. The purchase or lease must be made between July 1 and November 1, 2009. To qualify, a new vehicle lease must be for at least a 5 year period. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is referring to this program as the “Car Allowance Rebate System” at their website www.cars.gov.

To be eligible for trade in, a vehicle must

  • Be in drivable condition,
  • Have been continuously insured to the same owner for not less than a year at the time of trade,
  • Have been manufactured after 1984,
  • Generally, have a combined fuel economy value of 18 mpg or less.

The new vehicle must retail for less than $45,000 and must have a combined fuel economy value of at least 22 mpg for cars (18 mpg for category 1 trucks, which generally include SUVs, minivans, and pickup trucks, under 6,000 pounds).

Under the terms of the program, an electronic voucher will be issued directly to participating dealers that may be used to offset the purchase or lease price. The voucher will be worth:

  • $3,500 if the combined fuel economy value of the new vehicle is at least 4 mpg higher than that of the eligible trade-in (if the new vehicle is a category 1 truck, the combined fuel economy value must be at least 2 mpg higher than that of the eligible trade-in vehicle)
  • $4,500 if the combined fuel economy of the new vehicle is at least 10 mpg greater than that of the trade-in car (if the new vehicle is a category 1 truck, the combined fuel economy value must be at least 5 mpg higher than that of the eligible trade-in vehicle).

Since the dealer accepting the trade-in must destroy the vehicle, the only trade-in value of the vehicle will be the voucher value. As a result, the owner of a vehicle with a trade in value greater than the voucher amount will not benefit from the program.

Note: Special rules apply to heavier categories of trucks.

Deducting Sales and Excise Tax on a New Vehicle Purchase

Friday, April 24th, 2009

If you recently purchased a new vehicle, or intend to purchase one by the end of the year, you may benefit from a temporary new deduction created by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which was signed into law in February.

As a result of this legislation, if you purchase a new passenger automobile, light truck, or motorcycle (vehicles must have a gross weight rating of no more than 8,500 pounds) on or after February 17, 2009, and before January 1, 2010, you’ll generally be able to deduct any state or local sales and excise tax you pay on the purchase on your 2009 federal income tax return. New motor home purchases can qualify as well.

Individuals who itemize deductions on Form 1040, Schedule A, can include state or local sales and excise tax as part of their deduction for taxes paid. If you don’t itemize deductions, you can deduct the qualifying sales and excise tax as part of your standard deduction.

There are, however, a couple of limitations:

  • The amount of sales and excise tax that you can deduct is capped at the amount that would be paid on a vehicle with a purchase price of $49,500. So, if you purchase a $100,000 motor home, only the sales and excise tax attributable to the first $49,500 of your purchase price is deductible.
  • You’re not entitled to a deduction if your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is greater than $135,000 ($260,000 if you are married and file a joint return). And you’re only entitled to a partial deduction if your MAGI is between $125,000 and $135,000 (between $250,000 and $260,000 if you are married and file a joint return).

Note: For 2009, you already had the option to deduct general state and local sales tax in lieu of state and local income taxes–the new rules allow you to deduct the state or local sales and excise tax attributable to a new vehicle purchase in addition to state and local income tax. The new rules are also more generous in cases where your state imposes sales tax on a new vehicle purchase at a rate that’s higher than the general sales tax rate: the temporary deduction rules allow you to deduct the actual tax paid (subject to the limits noted above) instead of limiting you to the tax that would have been paid under the general sales tax rate.

No 2009 Required Minimum Distribution

Monday, March 16th, 2009

Congress passed a waiver of the minimum distribution rule for 2009.  The one-year moratorium on required minimum distributions (RMDs) from retirement accounts can provide much-needed financial relief.  The RMD suspension brings relief to the large share of retirement funds that had to be taken for 2008 because of the way that RMD is calculated.  Required withdrawals were high for 2008 because they were based on account totals as of December 31, 2007, when account values were up after years of stock market gains.  As a result, people who waited until the end of 2008 had to take high distributions out of greatly diminished retirement accounts.

This waiver of RMD affects the following retirement accounts:

  • Traditional IRA
  • 401(k)
  • Roth 401(k)
  • 403(b)
  • 457(b)
  • SEP
  • SARSEP
  • SIMPLE IRA

The RMD does not apply to Roth IRAs.  This does not apply for 2008 and RMD will apply again in 2010.

Understanding the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

If you recently purchased a first home, or intend to purchase a first home in the next few months, you may stand to benefit from the first-time homebuyer tax credit provisions included in the recently signed American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. When it comes to the first-time homebuyer tax credit, though, there’s quite a bit of confusion. So it’s worth taking a few minutes to make sure you understand how the credit works, and the time period to which it applies.

First, the credit isn’t new: Back in July of 2008, the Housing and Economic Recovery Act established a temporary refundable first-time homebuyer credit equal to 10% of the purchase price of a principal residence, up to $7,500 ($3,750 if married filing separately). The credit applied to first-time homebuyers who purchased a home on or after April 9, 2008, and before July 1, 2009. Generally, you qualified as a first-time homebuyer if you, and your spouse if you were married, did not own any other principal residence during the 3-year period ending on the date of purchase. The credit was phased out for individuals with higher incomes, and had to be paid back over 15 years in equal installments (repayment would be accelerated if the home were to be sold during the 15-year period or if the home ceased to be the principal residence of you or your spouse during that time).

The new legislation extends the credit to homes purchased by qualified first-time homebuyers through November 30, 2009. The new legislation also expands the credit. The credit remains 10% of the purchase price of the home, but the dollar limit has increased to $8,000 (the cap for married individuals filing separate returns is half that amount) for home purchases made after December 31, 2008, and before December 1, 2009. In addition, if you qualify for the credit as the result of a home purchase in 2009, you don’t have to pay it back over time, provided the home remains your principal residence for 36 months.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act continues to allow you to elect to report a qualifying home purchase made in 2009 as if it occurred on December 31, 2008 (allowing you to claim the credit on your 2008 federal income tax return). Unfortunately for many, the new legislation also continues to eliminate the credit for those with higher incomes. The credit is reduced if your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) exceeds $75,000 ($150,000 if you’re married and file a joint return) and is completely eliminated if your MAGI reaches $95,000 ($170,000 if you’re married and file a joint return).

Summary of rules for qualifying first-time homebuyers, by purchase date
When was home purchased? April 9, 2008 through December 31, 2008 January 1, 2009 through November 30, 2009
Maximum credit $7,500 ($3,750 if married filing separately) $8,000 ($4,000 if married filing separately)
Does credit have to be paid back? Yes–generally, over 15 years in equal installments No, provided the home remains your principal residence for 36 months
Credit is claimed on tax return for what year? 2008 federal income tax return You can elect to treat the purchase of the home as if it occurred on December 31, 2008, claiming credit on 2008 tax return ($8,000 maximum credit limit still applies even if reported on 2008 return); otherwise, credit is claimed on 2009 tax return.
Credit phased out for higher incomes? Yes Yes

Securities offered through RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., member FINRA/SIPC
Raymond James financial advisors may only conduct business with residents of the states and/or jurisdictions for which they are properly registered. Therefore, a response to a request for information may be delayed. Please note that not all of the investments and services mentioned are available in every state. Investors outside of the United States are subject to securities and tax regulations within their applicable jurisdictions that are not addressed on this site. Contact your local Raymond James office for information and availability.

The information contained in this report does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Ellis Financial Group, Inc. and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. This information is not intended as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security referred to herein. Investments mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.